You blocked me but to answer your fat arse question you left on my channel.
I have ” New York ” in my profile name because I made this account when I was still living in The Big Apple, you wankering arse. But left fat arse America in May 2008 to go back to Liverpool. And recently I moved from Liverpool to Spain.
Neither can an AK stop a solar flare, let alone a super flare, yet the NRA and gun manufacturies claim guns do protect, thus this means including solar flares.
Jaquie, thank you for showing us yet again the very definition of an ad absurdem argument. No shit an AK can’t take on a black hole. Yet this is not to say a gun can’t protect us from another person. You can’t use absurd analogies to justify your claim. It doesn’t work.
Please name me the NRA member who is touting the 50 Cal that can take on a star, hell tell me one who thinks it can take on a comet. They don’t exist and if they do they are not the norm.
Jakie-dyke is also using astronomy as a comparison to procreation.(just check out her channel) Granted, yes i have seen stars on occasion during the moment. But not to the point of trying to make a cosmic comparison. And that’s all I’m going to say about that!
The NRA is not the end-all-be-all spokesperson for gun owners. The NRA is not god in the eyes of gun owners. They are an organization that fights for our second amendment rights. Even if the NRA may or may not say something, that doesn’t make it true(even though it most likely is), and the NRA’s words aren’t the undisputed gospel of the gun owning public.
You don’t make any sense, and since you don’t have any real proof to back your statements, you are doing worse than those you claim to hate.
You are making baseless assumptions, and not giving people, or our criminal justice system enough credit.
If someone truly is stupid enough to think that they can defeat a natural disaster with a gun, chances are they are stupid enough to fuck up to the point that they aren’t legally allowed to own guns. If they decide to own guns past that point, they are criminals. Criminals by definition break the law. How would banning guns change this?
Yep, it could hit SF as well, but in SF we know we can’t do anything about is (it) so THAT’S WHY WE DON’T BUY GUNS and claim to protect ourselves from solar flares, earthquakes, tsunamis or whatever. YOUR WORDS
Don’t say that you did not say something especially when it can be proven that you did.
Let me guess, you got stoned and saw a movie like Knowing, or The day after, Heat, The day after tomorrow, etc. and actually believed that paralleled reality. OH, OK I understand! Well, kind of.
I’m a troll ? You came to my video and channel first. As long as guns and NRA don’t put up a disclaimer that says that guns can’t protect agaisnt natural disaster there will always be rednecks in the south who think a bullet can defeat an earthquake. Gun salesman must tell the buyer the gun will protect from other people but not against solar storms like in this video
So, I didn’t say I’m not a fire breathing dragon, so it’s obvious that I am a fire breathing dragon. You didn’t say you aren’t a bumble bee, so you are obviously a bumble bee.
Are you fucking kidding me?!? I am at a loss for words. I’m having a hard time believing you are a real person, and not just some troll looking to get a rise out of people. If you really are this stupid, you belong in a mental institution. All that pot smoke must have really fried your brain.
NRA says guns protect people, but they never said it can’t protect form natural disasters so it’s obvious many gun owners believe guns protect form natural disasters that’s why they are rednecks
Do you have any idea just how mind-blowing your stupidity is to everyone else that reads this stuff? I doubt there is a single anti-gunner in the USA who would agree with your logic.
And you’re venturing into very familiar territory speaking of the universe. Cosmology and theoretical physics are some of my biggest interests, so don’t think you’re boggling some dumb redneck’s mind with big fancy words.
I challenge you to show me ONE example of a gun owner who thinks these things. You can’t.
Michelle also has guns and she had them when she still lived in SF, so I could never have said that people in SF don’t buy guns. But very limited because Michelle moved them to another county being afraid of Gavin Newsom.
How come carl Sagan hasn’t spoken out about guns? Come on. I mean lumping the NRA in with astronomy facts and theories . Are you really that dizzy or is your mind that far gone?
BTW, are there or are there not any gun owners in SF? Or are you talking out of your ass again?
The universe may be bigger than we know bcuz we’re a NOT limited by space but we’re limited by time. We see galaxies at 47 billion light years away although it’s believed its about 14 billion years old, but could be older, but there could be galaxies much further than that but the light of those galaxies haven’t reached us yet. Even though the speed of light is faster than a bullet. So the NRA with their little guns will not be able to take over the universe for their agenda.
25 Comments
April 29th, 2010 at 11:08 pm
somehow I can’t post on your channel. There is no comment box or ” add comment ” link.
April 29th, 2010 at 11:16 pm
i have at no time blocked you.
BTW, the next time you use the term fat ass (arse) look in the mirror you hypocritical malcontent!
April 29th, 2010 at 11:49 pm
You blocked me but to answer your fat arse question you left on my channel.
I have ” New York ” in my profile name because I made this account when I was still living in The Big Apple, you wankering arse. But left fat arse America in May 2008 to go back to Liverpool. And recently I moved from Liverpool to Spain.
April 30th, 2010 at 12:46 am
Well I don’t believe anything could protect against that…What is your point?
A human can defend him or herself from a human anyday…
April 30th, 2010 at 1:39 am
The best way to stun crackie-jakie: USE LOGIC!
April 30th, 2010 at 2:31 am
Neither can an AK stop a solar flare, let alone a super flare, yet the NRA and gun manufacturies claim guns do protect, thus this means including solar flares.
April 30th, 2010 at 3:16 am
Jaquie, thank you for showing us yet again the very definition of an ad absurdem argument. No shit an AK can’t take on a black hole. Yet this is not to say a gun can’t protect us from another person. You can’t use absurd analogies to justify your claim. It doesn’t work.
Please name me the NRA member who is touting the 50 Cal that can take on a star, hell tell me one who thinks it can take on a comet. They don’t exist and if they do they are not the norm.
April 30th, 2010 at 4:00 am
PLEASE show me where the NRA made such a statement. It’s OK if you can’t. I figure that you can’t anyway.
April 30th, 2010 at 4:29 am
We can’t protect ourselves from black holes and neutron stars that move accross the universe yet the NRA says guns can protect while it can’t
April 30th, 2010 at 4:49 am
Fair enough (roll eyes). Than what, pray tell, would YOU use against the (laugh) gravity of a neutron star, solar flare, halley’s comet, ETC?
April 30th, 2010 at 5:05 am
Your AK 47 will loose a fight against a neutron star. The gravity of a neutron star will work as a magnet and will crush your AK 47 under it’s force.
April 30th, 2010 at 5:11 am
Jakie-dyke is also using astronomy as a comparison to procreation.(just check out her channel) Granted, yes i have seen stars on occasion during the moment. But not to the point of trying to make a cosmic comparison. And that’s all I’m going to say about that!
WHAT A DIZZY BITCH!
April 30th, 2010 at 6:04 am
The NRA is not the end-all-be-all spokesperson for gun owners. The NRA is not god in the eyes of gun owners. They are an organization that fights for our second amendment rights. Even if the NRA may or may not say something, that doesn’t make it true(even though it most likely is), and the NRA’s words aren’t the undisputed gospel of the gun owning public.
You don’t make any sense, and since you don’t have any real proof to back your statements, you are doing worse than those you claim to hate.
April 30th, 2010 at 7:04 am
You are making baseless assumptions, and not giving people, or our criminal justice system enough credit.
If someone truly is stupid enough to think that they can defeat a natural disaster with a gun, chances are they are stupid enough to fuck up to the point that they aren’t legally allowed to own guns. If they decide to own guns past that point, they are criminals. Criminals by definition break the law. How would banning guns change this?
April 30th, 2010 at 7:33 am
you would have to be pretty f***ing pathetic to be afriaid of (laugh) Gavin Newsom!
April 30th, 2010 at 7:35 am
Yep, it could hit SF as well, but in SF we know we can’t do anything about is (it) so THAT’S WHY WE DON’T BUY GUNS and claim to protect ourselves from solar flares, earthquakes, tsunamis or whatever. YOUR WORDS
Don’t say that you did not say something especially when it can be proven that you did.
Let me guess, you got stoned and saw a movie like Knowing, or The day after, Heat, The day after tomorrow, etc. and actually believed that paralleled reality. OH, OK I understand! Well, kind of.
April 30th, 2010 at 7:52 am
I’m a troll ? You came to my video and channel first. As long as guns and NRA don’t put up a disclaimer that says that guns can’t protect agaisnt natural disaster there will always be rednecks in the south who think a bullet can defeat an earthquake. Gun salesman must tell the buyer the gun will protect from other people but not against solar storms like in this video
April 30th, 2010 at 7:56 am
So, I didn’t say I’m not a fire breathing dragon, so it’s obvious that I am a fire breathing dragon. You didn’t say you aren’t a bumble bee, so you are obviously a bumble bee.
Are you fucking kidding me?!? I am at a loss for words. I’m having a hard time believing you are a real person, and not just some troll looking to get a rise out of people. If you really are this stupid, you belong in a mental institution. All that pot smoke must have really fried your brain.
April 30th, 2010 at 8:01 am
NRA says guns protect people, but they never said it can’t protect form natural disasters so it’s obvious many gun owners believe guns protect form natural disasters that’s why they are rednecks
April 30th, 2010 at 8:19 am
Do you have any idea just how mind-blowing your stupidity is to everyone else that reads this stuff? I doubt there is a single anti-gunner in the USA who would agree with your logic.
And you’re venturing into very familiar territory speaking of the universe. Cosmology and theoretical physics are some of my biggest interests, so don’t think you’re boggling some dumb redneck’s mind with big fancy words.
I challenge you to show me ONE example of a gun owner who thinks these things. You can’t.
April 30th, 2010 at 9:00 am
Michelle also has guns and she had them when she still lived in SF, so I could never have said that people in SF don’t buy guns. But very limited because Michelle moved them to another county being afraid of Gavin Newsom.
April 30th, 2010 at 9:58 am
“So that’s why we don’t buy guns”……you’re right.
Sorry. Still, it’s kind of hard to own w/o buying. Well, maybe not in your case.
April 30th, 2010 at 10:56 am
I never said there were no gun owners in SF
April 30th, 2010 at 11:37 am
How come carl Sagan hasn’t spoken out about guns? Come on. I mean lumping the NRA in with astronomy facts and theories . Are you really that dizzy or is your mind that far gone?
BTW, are there or are there not any gun owners in SF? Or are you talking out of your ass again?
April 30th, 2010 at 12:19 pm
The universe may be bigger than we know bcuz we’re a NOT limited by space but we’re limited by time. We see galaxies at 47 billion light years away although it’s believed its about 14 billion years old, but could be older, but there could be galaxies much further than that but the light of those galaxies haven’t reached us yet. Even though the speed of light is faster than a bullet. So the NRA with their little guns will not be able to take over the universe for their agenda.