Earth’s Rapid Field Reversal: Young Earth Evidence!
By
Nuclear physicist, Dr Russell Humphreys describes how paleomagnetic research indicates our field can not be more than 10000 years old. Problems with the dynamo model of the earth’s Magnetic Field are presented, as is the accuracy with which his model predicted magnetic strengths of other planets. You may listen online or download the file. Dr Humphreys was awarded his Ph.D. in physics from Louisiana State University in 1972. For the next 6 years he worked in the High Voltage Laboratory of General Electric Company, designing and inventing equipment and researching high-voltage phenomena. While there, he received a US patent and one of Industrial Research Magazine’s IR-100 awards. Beginning in 1979 he worked for Sandia National Laboratories (New Mexico) in nuclear physics, geophysics, pulsed-power research, and theoretical atomic and nuclear physics. In 1985, he began working with Sandia’s ‘Particle Beam Fusion Project’, and was co-inventor of special laser-triggered ‘Rimfire’ high-voltage switches, now coming into wider use. The last few years at Sandia had seen greater emphasis on theoretical nuclear physics and radiation hydrodynamics in an effort to help produce the world’s first lab-scale thermonuclear fusion. Besides gaining another US patent, Dr Humphreys has been given two awards from Sandia, including an Award for Excellence for contributions to light ion-fusion target theory. Dr Humphreys has retired from Sandia and now works with the Institute for Creation …
Video Rating: 3 / 5
Twitter
Facebook
25 Comments
July 21st, 2011 at 4:20 am
@newmanfrigan All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it’s too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK
July 21st, 2011 at 4:24 am
This is absolute fecal matter. Completely irrational and nonscientific interpretation.
July 21st, 2011 at 4:30 am
SandustanBrasov
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak’s installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics’ future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone’s tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
July 21st, 2011 at 5:02 am
Maybe the Sun fuels the Earths core by radiation keeping the electrons flowing and the Earths core hot.Almost like the solar sysyem is a machine winding down Because even the Sun at some time will burn out.There seems to be purpose behinde the universe what I’m not sure exactly but It’s vast who could know it.
July 21st, 2011 at 5:23 am
@SqueakerAlpha evolution has nothing to do with science and mathematics.It’s all alone…..
July 21st, 2011 at 5:51 am
Magnetic reversals were used to prove sea floor spreading and the theory of plate tectonice. Which means the earth is millions of years old !
July 21st, 2011 at 6:24 am
WTF Creationism
July 21st, 2011 at 7:05 am
If anyone disbelieves science , but had your kids immunized, or is using a computer please join the hypocrites line . Thanks . evolutionery science in both.
July 21st, 2011 at 8:03 am
fucking Christer!!
July 21st, 2011 at 8:56 am
@Benwoodruff agree with you that science is self correcting… well i didnt said i dont believe in science, i said “i dont believe 100%” both in science and in religion xD religion, politics, & science are some times used to deceive and take control over men…
July 21st, 2011 at 9:20 am
@chalcol06 It is possible but science is self correcting. I find it funny that you don’t believe in science as you type on your computer which is connected to the internet. Let me guess, you also ride in automobiles and have a cell phone.
July 21st, 2011 at 9:45 am
@emperorzong science can fool the whole so called intellectual being :p
July 21st, 2011 at 9:54 am
@Benwoodruff hehe science can be totally wrong… i dont believe 100% in science nor any religion… all bs at some point!! haha
July 21st, 2011 at 10:27 am
@Benwoodruff hehe science can be totally wrong… i dont believe 100% in science nor any religion… all bs at some point!! haha
July 21st, 2011 at 11:19 am
Sad that he was so quick to reject science because it didn’t fit his religion.
Talk origins has this debunked.
July 21st, 2011 at 11:57 am
@1axvn
Everyone knows that there is an invisible wizard in the sky who exactly 6,000 years ago decided to make a monkey so he got some voodoo putty from his friend Moses and sculptured a squirrel monkey from it then went “Ala Kazam!” and lighting came out of his fingers and the monkey said hello.
If you don’t believe that you will burn in hell you ridiculous criminal sin-filled cunt-demon.
July 21st, 2011 at 12:11 pm
I’ll take my own version thanks
July 21st, 2011 at 1:08 pm
religion can destroy the most educated mind.
July 21st, 2011 at 2:02 pm
@cathy356
Why should evolutionists be worried about red-shifts anyway?
That’s cosmology. Not evolution.
July 21st, 2011 at 2:35 pm
@cathy356
“What are your credentials?”
Microcomputer Engineering Technologist.
“Yes it is young or we couldn’t see red shifts.”
Explain. We see red shifts because the objects emitting the light are moving away from us at relativistic speeds. “Doppler Effect”. This has nothing to do with young-earth unless you can clarify.
“(Evolutionists) are afraid of the center position we have in our galaxy.”
What?! Who told you this double-fallacy? XD
July 21st, 2011 at 2:54 pm
@L00NGB00W What are your credentials? And yes it is young or we couldn’t see red shifts. The evolutionists refuse to even study this effect, because they are afraid of the center position we have in our galaxy.
July 21st, 2011 at 3:54 pm
Come on.
The Earth’s magnetic field reverses in intervals ranging from 5000 years, to 50 million years. It’s a natural phenomena. This reversal has occurred many, many times in the past.
The average time-span of ONE reversal is 25002500 years. That number totally blows away the young earth fairytale. Now multiply that number by the number of reversals that have REALLY occurred. The earth isn’t young.
People who say otherwise, are simply not being scientific. Despite their credentials.
July 21st, 2011 at 4:15 pm
@tamarind777 not smarter then god just smarter then the rag head that was trying to enslave the minds of the people of the area at the time he wrote it.
July 21st, 2011 at 4:24 pm
@chaneltanita
Creationists want to to think scientists don’t agree, ”teach the controversy” BS.
July 21st, 2011 at 4:28 pm
@chaneltanita
Geologists know the earth is old, they figured it out 200 years ago.